Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tim Small's avatar

An interesting trip into dangerous waters. But it’s not clear from the info set-up that the babysitter was actually groped; you float that later. A purely verbal come-on would be less urgent and could conceivably call for a slightly different response. In any case it’s ultimately a deal-breaker any way ya cut it. It says a lot about Anne Landers’ mentality that a babysitting gig could be potentially worth negotiating or finessing over even when one of the customers is a sketchy creep. Given your penchant for looking backwards, perhaps you’ll agree: having been around then - it was the year I graduated from high school - I think she was blinkered by the waning shadow of the Depression. After subsequent decades of relative prosperity hardly anyone would consider a crap teen job worth the possible consequences.

Expand full comment
fredm421's avatar

I dunno. The Ann Landers advise seems tactical in nature. That is, given the context, the best a 16 yo could do for herself was ensure her immediate safety (not being alone with the groppy adult) and gently blackmail him. Similarly, not warning other babysitters is (and was) morally wrong but it was (according to Landers and I don't disagree) the best way for that sitter to protect herself because warning others would open the whole can of worms and the sitter would catch a life destroying amount of flak, regardless of what happened to the adult.

In today's environment of "believe all women", MeToo etc, the advise can be significantly different and the sitter can pursue a far more morally correct course of action without risking nearly as much as she would have in '78. Progress.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts